| COMMUNES: PEASANTS
WORK OVERTIME DURING THE GREAT LEAP FORWARD
In the socialist scheme of things,
communes are considered ideal forms of organization for agriculture. They
are supposed to increase productivity and equality, reduce inefficiencies
of small-scale individual farming, and bring modern benefits to the countryside
more rapidly through rural industrialization.
These objectives are attained largely through the economies of scale of
communes; that is, it is presumed that things done on a large scale are
more efficient and cost-effective than when done on a small scale. Thus,
using tractors, harvesters, trucks, and other agricultural machinery makes
sense when large tracts of land can be planted with the same crops and
plowed at one time. Similarly, small-scale industries may be based on
the communal unit of 30,000 to 70,000 people, since, in such a large work
unit, some people can take care of agricultural needs for the entire commune,
leaving others to work in commune-based industries.
Because of its size, a commune may also support other types of organizations
that smaller work units would find impossible to support, both financially
and otherwise. A commune, for example, can support a hospital, a high
school, an agricultural-research organization, and, if the commune is
wealthy enough, even a "sports palace" and a cultural center for movies
and entertainment.
During the Great Leap Forward, launched in 1958, peasants were-much against
their will-forced into these larger agricultural and administrative units.
They were particularly distressed that their remaining private plots were
taken away from them. Communal kitchens, run by women, were to prepare
food for everyone while workers went about their other productive work.
Peasants were told that they had to eat in the communal mess halls rather
than in the privacy of their own homes.
When the combination of bad policies and bad weather led to a severe famine,
widespread peasant resistance forced the government to retreat from the
Great Leap Forward policy and abandon the communes. But a modified commune
system remained intact in much of China until the late 1970s, when the
government ordered communes to be dissolved. A commune's collective property
was then distributed to the peasants belonging to it, and a system of
contract responsibility was launched. Today, with the exception of a few
communes that refused to be dissolved, agricultural production is no longer
collectivized. Individual households are again, as before 1953, engaged
in small-scale agricultural production on private plots of land.
|